Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)microolap(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Date: 2013-12-05 17:43:48
Message-ID: 19A48973-07F7-4413-B617-C3F7C1937661@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> BTW, another arguable advantage of fixing this via new functions is
> that users could write equivalent (though no doubt slower) functions
> for use in pre-9.4 releases, and thus not need to maintain multiple
> versions of app code that relies on this behavior.

+1 to this idea. Feels cleanest.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-12-05 17:49:48 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2013-12-05 17:27:13 Re: Time-Delayed Standbys