Re: [HACKERS] Long table names

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Finn Kettner <fk(at)akf(dot)dk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Long table names
Date: 1999-08-16 18:01:42
Message-ID: 199908161801.OAA06503@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hi there.
>
> I remember someone talking about compiling pgsql so that it could use
> table names longer than 32 bytes, but that it would require some
> changes in the source code. Could anyone tell me what changes these
> are, and how safe it would be to do it (that is, should I assume that
> I could just compile a newer version making the same changes to the
> sources, and have anyone experienced anything broken using the longer
> table names)???
>
> Yours faithfully.
> Finn Kettner.
> PS. The main reasong for the longer table names is not the tables
> themself, but the indexes etc. that are constructed automatically
> using e.g. serial fields.

That serial table name is fixed in 6.5.*.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Kramer 1999-08-16 18:22:44 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-08-16 17:53:21 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types