Re: [HACKERS] Timespan_div misbehaving?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Timespan_div misbehaving?
Date: 1999-03-09 02:18:00
Message-ID: 199903090218.VAA15020@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I said:
> > It looks like the entry for it in pg_proc is right, but the one in
> > pg_operator is wrong.
> >
> > Hmm, a whole new class of cross-checks that opr_sanity ought to make ;-)
>
> Indeed, applying a mechanical cross-check was fruitful ... I found four
> dozen pg_operator entries that disagree with the corresponding pg_proc
> entries:

Tom, would you please take the pg/include/catalog/*.sql files and merge
them into the regression sanity checks? They should be in there too.
You can remove them once you have moved them over.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-03-09 02:28:31 Re: [HACKERS] a "bug" in v6.4.3 ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-03-09 01:55:20 Re: [HACKERS] Timespan_div misbehaving?