Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think that it should be coded
>> to ignore ENOENT the same as the bgwriter does, and that it should press
>> on and keep trying to delete things even if it gets a failure.
> Perhaps, if it gets ENOENT, record this fact -- and after rmtree
> returns, retry the whole thing.
Er, retry what? There was, presumably, nothing to delete.
regards, tom lane