| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ... |
| Date: | 2012-08-24 14:10:07 |
| Message-ID: | 19682.1345817407@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> TBH I'd rather stick with the less invasive approach of the original patch
>> at this stage, and see about refactoring for 9.3.
> +1.
> While I haven't looked at the code specifically, these areas can be
> quite fragile and very environment-dependent. I'd rather not upset it
> this close to release - especially not after RC wrap.
Fair enough. Will one of you deal with the patch as-is, then?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-24 14:30:45 | Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-24 14:08:58 | Re: pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement |