| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format |
| Date: | 2009-08-10 17:51:28 |
| Message-ID: | 19564.1249926688@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi:
>> Doesn't seem quite right. Should we throw error if the number of 9's
>> before the decimal point isn't 1?
> No, see
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4A68FAE4.50206@timbira.com
Ah, nothing like being bug-compatible with a bad implementation.
But I agree, if Oracle ignores the number of 9's there then we
should too.
BTW, this patch adds more NUM_cache_remove() calls. I'm planning
to commit it that way, unless you're just about to commit your PG_TRY
change? I agree with doing that, but figured it should be a separate
commit.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-08-10 17:55:07 | Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-10 17:45:45 | Re: machine-readable explain output v4 |