| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 20:18:07 |
| Message-ID: | 19449.1163794687@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I don't see any comparable arguments about this full-text search stuff.
> In particular I don't see any arguments why a change would necessary at
> all, including why moving to core would be necessary in the first
> place.
AFAIR the only argument in favor of that is basically a marketing one:
users perceive a feature as more real, or more supported, if it's in
core. I don't find this argument especially compelling myself.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeremy Drake | 2006-11-17 20:30:45 | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-17 20:17:46 | Re: Frequent Update Project: Design Overview ofHOTUpdates |