Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I want to propose a new feature called "priority table" or "cache table".
> This is same as regular table except the pages of these tables are having
> high priority than normal tables. These tables are very useful, where a
> faster query processing on some particular tables is expected.
Why exactly does the existing LRU behavior of shared buffers not do
what you need?
I am really dubious that letting DBAs manage buffers is going to be
an improvement over automatic management.
regards, tom lane