From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: NULL's support in SP-GiST |
Date: | 2012-03-07 21:03:21 |
Message-ID: | 19145.1331154201@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I guess the question is whether this is a stop-ship item for spgist.
> If it is, then we're going to have to spend the time to fix this, but
> if not, then since it was submitted more than two weeks after the
> start of the CommitFest, it seems we should postpone it to 9.3.
If we buy into the assumption that nulls support can/should be bolted on
after the fact, then postponing it to 9.3 would be reasonable. I wasn't
very happy with that idea though, and would like to look at this issue
before 9.2 gets frozen. So please don't pull it from the CF yet.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-07 21:10:56 | Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2012-03-07 21:02:43 | Re: patch for a locale-specific bug in regression tests (REL9_1_STABLE) |