Re: NULL's support in SP-GiST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NULL's support in SP-GiST
Date: 2012-03-07 21:03:21
Message-ID: 19145.1331154201@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I guess the question is whether this is a stop-ship item for spgist.
> If it is, then we're going to have to spend the time to fix this, but
> if not, then since it was submitted more than two weeks after the
> start of the CommitFest, it seems we should postpone it to 9.3.

If we buy into the assumption that nulls support can/should be bolted on
after the fact, then postponing it to 9.3 would be reasonable. I wasn't
very happy with that idea though, and would like to look at this issue
before 9.2 gets frozen. So please don't pull it from the CF yet.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-03-07 21:10:56 Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2012-03-07 21:02:43 Re: patch for a locale-specific bug in regression tests (REL9_1_STABLE)