Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Common Table Expressions (WITH RECURSIVE) patch
Date: 2008-09-16 22:40:00
Message-ID: 19040.1221604800@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I had either on that a while back. I think the existing tuplestore can
> be made to work without bad performance penaltiesbin the usual case.
> The trick was to do it without making the code unreadable.

> I can send the code I had but I doubt you want to use it as-is.

Sure. Maybe someone else will see a way to make it more readable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2008-09-16 22:50:51 Re: Patch for SQL-standard negative valued year-month literals
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-16 22:36:27 Re: Patch for SQL-standard negative valued year-month literals