Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date: 2013-05-27 01:49:34
Message-ID: 18865.1369619374@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> btw, has anyone posted the SM API proposal..? Unfortunately, I think I
> had to leave before that was hashed out..

There isn't one yet. We think we understand where the pain points are,
but there's still a long way to go to have a proposal.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2013-05-27 02:59:43 Re: Processing long AND/OR lists
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-05-27 01:18:41 Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0