Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 7 August 2010 03:51, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I was testing out this feature this morning and discovered that the
> results may be non-deterministic if the PK is deferrable.
Good point.
> The original version of the patch had that check in it, but it
> vanished from the final committed version. Was that just an oversight,
> or an intentional change?
I don't recall having thought about it one way or the other. What did
the check look like?
regards, tom lane