Re: is this a bug or I am blind?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Mage <mage(at)mage(dot)hu>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is this a bug or I am blind?
Date: 2005-12-15 23:55:45
Message-ID: 18323.1134690945@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> What runtime penalty? It seems likely that strcoll is implemented by the
> equivalent of calling strxfrm twice internally anyways.

Only by a very incompetent implementor.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-16 00:06:34 Re: Timestamp <-> ctime conversion question ...
Previous Message Gregory S. Williamson 2005-12-15 23:27:06 Re: outdated (bad) information in pg_stat_activity