| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, "Kuhn, Dylan K (4520500D)" <Dylan(dot)Kuhn(at)navy(dot)mil>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_restore |
| Date: | 2003-07-16 14:41:39 |
| Message-ID: | 18172.1058366499@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:03:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Given the current implementation, it seems like there are three possible
>> behaviors for COMMENT ON DATABASE when the database name isn't the same
>> as the current database:
> There's a fourth possibility: ignore the command and issue a WARNING.
Hmm, that seems like a reasonable choice. Anyone have an objection?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Biagioni | 2003-07-16 22:37:52 | Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-07-15 20:47:04 | Re: [HACKERS] problems with pg_restore |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-07-16 14:55:48 | Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg? |
| Previous Message | Christoph Haller | 2003-07-16 14:06:46 | Re: FROM clause omitted |