Re: Bytea poor performance

From: "NSO" <nso(at)fmf(dot)vtu(dot)lt>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bytea poor performance
Date: 2005-10-15 16:16:30
Message-ID: 18133.81.7.89.65.1129392990.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello,

Yes, I can understand that, but then why the same app on the server
machine is done in 4 seconds? (big difference from 20-30 seconds). I
tryed to monitor network traffic and it is used only for 1-2% of total
100mbit.

> "NSO" <nso(at)fmf(dot)vtu(dot)lt> writes:
>> Query runs very long:
>> Total query runtime: 23625 ms.
>> Data retrieval runtime: 266 ms.
>> 50 rows retrieved.
>
> Notice that the query itself took 266ms. The rest of the time was
> wasted by your client app trying to format a 23Kb by 50 row table
> for display. You need to replace your client-side code with something
> less inefficient about handling wide values.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
>
>

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-15 16:24:24 Re: Bytea poor performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-15 15:54:07 Re: Bytea poor performance