Re: - Proposal for repreparing prepared statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marshall, Steve" <smarshall(at)wsi(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: - Proposal for repreparing prepared statements
Date: 2006-09-13 22:12:05
Message-ID: 18084.1158185525@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marshall, Steve" <smarshall(at)wsi(dot)com> writes:
>> But forcing a reload of pltcl.so is nothing but a kluge --- it leaks
>> memory like there's no tomorrow, and it's only an accident that it fails
>> to crash. I don't want to design a further kluge on top of it.

> Are you saying that pltcl.so leaks memory in general, or that forcing a
> reload of the pltcl.so library leaks memory?

The latter. There's no mechanism to release the previous instance's data
structures (Tcl interpreters, function bodies, etc).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-13 22:18:14 Re: [PATCHES] Linking on AIX (Was: Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries )
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2006-09-13 22:08:40 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta