| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
| Date: | 2015-02-05 01:24:49 |
| Message-ID: | 18004.1423099489@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> The phrase "{INDEX | TABLE |..} name" seems to me indivisible as
> target specification. IMHO, the options for VACUUM and so is
> placed *just after* command name, not *before* the target.
> If this is right, the syntax would be like this.
> REINDEX [ (option [, option ...] ) ] {INDEX | TABLE | etc } name
> What do you think about this?
I think this is wrong and ugly. INDEX etc are part of the command name.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-05 01:33:12 | Re: binworld and install-binworld targets - was Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-02-05 01:20:49 | Re: binworld and install-binworld targets - was Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand |