Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes
Date: 2015-01-19 15:06:01
Message-ID: 1796159.aj7JJD9sVU@obelix
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le samedi 17 janvier 2015 08:23:44 Michael Paquier a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Robert Haas
<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > There's only value in adding a fillfactor parameter to GIN indexes
> > if
> > it improves performance. There are no benchmarks showing it does.
> > So, why are we still talking about this?
>
> Indeed. There is no such benchmark as of now, and I am not sure I'll
> get the time to work more on that soon, so let's reject the patch for
> now. And sorry for the useless noise.

Michael, I first didn't understood how GiN can benefits from the
patch...thus my question.
There were no noise for me, and I learn some more about GiN. So I thank
you for your work!

--
Cédric Villemain +33 (0)6 20 30 22 52
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/
PostgreSQL: Support 24x7 - Développement, Expertise et Formation

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2015-01-19 15:09:15 Re: Reducing buildfarm disk usage: remove temp installs when done
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2015-01-19 14:59:14 Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review