Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Markus Wanner" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Date: 2008-09-11 12:54:48
Message-ID: 17926.1221137688@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Which signal should WAL sender send to backends?

Sooner or later we shall have to bite the bullet and set up a
multiplexing system to transmit multiple event types to backends with
just one signal. We already did it for signals to the postmaster.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2008-09-11 13:00:08 Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication
Previous Message Csaba Nagy 2008-09-11 12:53:59 Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby