Re: mvcc.sgml make up

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Volkan YAZICI <volkan(dot)yazici(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mvcc.sgml make up
Date: 2005-12-05 19:39:12
Message-ID: 1788.1133811552@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Volkan YAZICI <volkan(dot)yazici(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> For the second mvcc.sgml edit, there's a huge difference between "two
> successive SELECT commands" and "two successive same SELECT commands".

Indeed, and I would argue that your proposed change is exactly wrong.
For instance,
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE col > 4;
SELECT * FROM foo WHERE col > 5;
Under READ COMMITTED, the second SELECT may retrieve rows not found by
the first, which would be impossible under SERIALIZABLE mode.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Seneca Cunningham 2005-12-05 20:09:33 AIX FAQ update
Previous Message Dennis Bjorklund 2005-12-05 19:35:18 I have a non-ascii name.