Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs
Date: 2012-12-16 18:44:20
Message-ID: 17877.1355683460@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On further thought the function name should just be what it is defined
>> in postgresql, like this

>> CREATE FUNCTION foo(a,b,c) AS $$
>> def foo(a,b,c):

BTW, how well will that play with overloaded function names? I don't
particularly care for saying that PL/Python fails if you overload a
function name across multiple schemas or argument lists ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2012-12-16 18:56:55 Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-12-16 18:37:04 Re: multiple CREATE FUNCTION AS items for PLs