| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting |
| Date: | 2006-08-17 17:24:34 |
| Message-ID: | 17758.1155835474@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Then why bother with two different lists?
>>
>> If developers need to be on both list (which I beleive they do), and the
>> focus of both lists is developers, then why not just remove one of them
>> and get rid of the problem?
> I wouldn't argue with that. It would be at least equally good from my
> perspective, and maybe slightly better.
One big difference between the two lists is the maximum-message-size
policy ;-). To unify them we would need to relax the size limit on
-hackers, and I'm not convinced that's a good idea. It would likely
drive away at least some people who currently provide valuable ideas
even though they don't care to receive -patches.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-17 17:25:03 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-08-17 17:22:58 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-17 17:28:57 | Re: [HACKERS] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-08-17 17:22:58 | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |