Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
Date: 2011-02-04 19:48:44
Message-ID: 17706.1296848924@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> What are the guc.c changes in this patch? They appear completely
>> unrelated to the topic.

> Right. Didn't spot them. Sorry for the noise in the patch, it must be
> a merge problem in my repository. Do you want me to clean that up or is
> it already to late?

No need, I'll just drop that file from the patch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-02-04 19:49:53 Re: Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-04 19:48:06 Re: Use a separate pg_depend.deptype for extension membership?