Re: possible vacuum improvement?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: possible vacuum improvement?
Date: 2002-09-03 20:24:56
Message-ID: 17448.1031084696@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com> writes:
> That brings me to another point, can't the
> statistics collector used for that?

Hmm, that would be a different way of attacking the problem. Not sure
offhand which is better, but it'd surely be worth considering both.

Note that collecting of dead-tuple counts requires input from aborted
transactions as well as successful ones. I don't recall whether the
stats collector currently collects anything from aborted xacts; that
might or might not be a sticky point.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-03 20:42:49 Re: 7.2.2 bug?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-03 20:09:40 Re: CREATE CAST requires immutable cast function?