Re: Bytea poor performance

From: "NSO" <nso(at)fmf(dot)vtu(dot)lt>
To: "Sean Davis" <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bytea poor performance
Date: 2005-10-15 14:00:09
Message-ID: 17363.81.7.89.65.1129384809.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello,

How about some explain analyze output?
Explain analyse select * from files where nr > 1450

"Index Scan using pk on files (cost=0.00..3.67 rows=50 width=36)
(actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=50 loops=1)"

Have you done a full vacuum lately? How about reindexing?
Yes, I did reindexing and vacuum full just before query..

> On 10/15/05 9:20 AM, "NSO" <nso(at)fmf(dot)vtu(dot)lt> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to select form table with bytea field. And queries runs very
>> slow.
>> My table:
>> CREATE TABLE files (file bytea, nr serial NOT NULL) WITH OIDS;
>>
>> Query:
>> select * from files where nr > 1450
>>
>> (I have total 1500 records in it, every holds picture of 23kB size)
>> Query runs very long:
>> Total query runtime: 23625 ms.
>> Data retrieval runtime: 266 ms.
>> 50 rows retrieved.
>>
>> explain:
>> Index Scan using pk on files (cost=0.00..3.67 rows=50 width=36)
>> Index Cond: (nr > 1450)
>>
>> Is it possible to do something with it? or it is normal? Our server is
>> fast, and all other tables work fine..
>
> How about some explain analyze output? Have you done a full vacuum
> lately?
> How about reindexing?
>
> Sean
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
>
>

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sean Davis 2005-10-15 14:08:20 Re: Bytea poor performance
Previous Message Sean Davis 2005-10-15 13:40:28 Re: Bytea poor performance