| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling |
| Date: | 2010-01-07 20:36:31 |
| Message-ID: | 16718.1262896591@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am tempted to say we should clamp down and go into damage control
> mode sooner rather than later.
The more I see of the HS patch, the more I think the same. But my
proposal for "damage control mode" would be to immediately punt
everything else to the next release and focus our energies exclusively
on HS *and* SR. In terms of the "big picture" for the project, those
are headline items, and everything else is just trivia that the average
user won't even notice.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2010-01-07 20:36:38 | Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Add-On Network |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-07 20:33:09 | Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling |