Re: extension_control_path

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: extension_control_path
Date: 2014-01-14 15:33:08
Message-ID: 16575.1389713588@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Please find attached to this email a patch implementing a new GUC that
> allows users to setup a list of path where PostgreSQL will search for
> the extension control files at CREATE EXTENSION time.

Why is that a good idea? It's certainly not going to simplify DBAs'
lives, more the reverse. ("This dump won't reload." "Uh, where did
you get that extension from?" "Ummm...")

Assuming that there is some need for loading extensions from nonstandard
places, would it be better to just allow a filename specification in
CREATE EXTENSION? (I don't know the answer, since the use-case isn't
apparent to me in the first place, but it seems worth asking.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2014-01-14 15:35:25 Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan
Previous Message James Bottomley 2014-01-14 15:32:25 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance