Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Date: 2014-04-23 00:50:20
Message-ID: 16527.1398214220@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?

Not sure. I'm for changing it, I think, but it wasn't at all clear
that we had consensus on that. We did not have a proposed new name
for the opclass either ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2014-04-23 08:20:42 Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-04-22 22:40:51 Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2014-04-23 01:01:14 Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-04-23 00:47:32 Re: [GENERAL] aggregate returning anyarray and 'cannot determine result data type'