Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> I suppose we can just regard it as a build problem, then? Not sure what
> the actual culprit was, though...
I'm mystified too. But unless we see it again, I think we have to write
it off as a build error.
Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I don't, so I know that
I take some risk of build errors when I do things wrong.
regards, tom lane