| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FOREIGN TABLE doc fix |
| Date: | 2011-06-13 14:20:44 |
| Message-ID: | 16371.1307974844@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Incidentally, are you planning to revive the PostgreSQL FDW for 9.2?
>>> That would be a killer feature.
>> Even more killer would be that it could be built/packaged as an
>> extension, and use for 9.1 too ;-)
> +1!
Don't hold your breath. We'll probably be making enough changes in the
FDW infrastructure (particularly planner support) that making an FDW
work on both 9.1 and 9.2 would be an exercise in frustration, if it's
even possible.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2011-06-13 14:25:47 | Re: FOREIGN TABLE doc fix |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-06-13 14:19:33 | Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY |