Re: info about patch: using parametrised query in psql

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: info about patch: using parametrised query in psql
Date: 2009-12-25 19:16:16
Message-ID: 162867790912251116y4049212ie69575eeb009d6bf@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/12/25 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> If we do want to go
>> with a single flag character, maybe it should just be a single or
>> double quote:
>
>> :'foo - quote as a literal
>> :"foo - quote as an ident
>
> I would've proposed that myself if I thought it would work, but I'm
> afraid that it will wreak complete chaos from a parsing standpoint.
> Half the tools in the world will think this is an incomplete literal,
> and I'm not even very sure you could keep psql itself from getting
> confused.
>

I though about it too.

> Hmm ... actually, though, what about combining the ideas:
>
>        :'foo' - quote as a literal
>        :"foo" - quote as an ident
>
> This leaves us with nothing much as far as extensibility, but from
> a mnemonic standpoint it's a large win.

+1

Pavel

>
>                        regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-25 19:17:56 Re: info about patch: using parametrised query in psql
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-12-25 19:12:58 Re: ORDER BY clause in aggregate doesn't work well with multi argument aggregates