Re: Application name patch - v2

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Date: 2009-10-19 11:33:16
Message-ID: 162867790910190433j28575186rb6a18c39915b0be@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/10/19 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> sure, you have to fix fulnerable application. But with some
>> unsophisticated using %a and using wrong tools, the people can be
>> blind and don't register an SQL injection attack.
>
> If they're logging the statements (which they presumably are if
> looking for unusual activity), then they'll see the attack:
>
> dpage(at)myapp: LOG:  connection authorized: user=dpage database=postgres
> dpage(at)myapp: LOG:  statement: set application_name='hax0red';
> dpage(at)hax0red: LOG:  disconnection: session time: 0:00:20.152
> user=dpage database=postgres host=[local]
>

this is bad solution. yes, I can found probmlematics rows, but I'll
get ten or more larger log. This is available only when loging of
application name changes depend on own configuration setting.

Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-10-19 11:34:55 Re: Rejecting weak passwords
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-10-19 10:39:58 Re: Application name patch - v2