From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
Date: | 2009-08-16 12:59:53 |
Message-ID: | 162867790908160559t61dad91t73181ecb20d7318e@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/8/16 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> SQL is not Lisp. Simple is good. I didn't think Peter was really very
>> serious.
>
> Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully
> expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other
> expressions. So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not
> integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me.
>
+1
Pavel
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-08-16 13:21:38 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-08-16 12:57:08 | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |