Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: 2009-08-16 12:59:53
Message-ID: 162867790908160559t61dad91t73181ecb20d7318e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/8/16 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> On sön, 2009-08-16 at 00:04 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> SQL is not Lisp. Simple is  good. I didn't think Peter was really very
>> serious.
>
> Well, I don't know if we really need to call it "lambda", but I fully
> expect to be able to use these "ad hoc functions" as part of other
> expressions.  So making DO or whatever a top-level command that does not
> integrate with anything else would not really satisfy me.
>

+1

Pavel

>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2009-08-16 13:21:38 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-08-16 12:57:08 Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema