| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Martin Pihlak" <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Date: | 2008-08-18 09:05:02 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790808180205o4102e1e8q6397ede36b747d3e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/8/18 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 18 août 2008, Andrew Dunstan a écrit :
>> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches.
>>
>> So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching.
>
> I fail to understand why this problem is not qualified as a bug.
>
Does it change of result some queries? It is protection to server's hang?
> Regards,
> --
> dim
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | leiyonghua | 2008-08-18 09:28:24 | Re: Postgres-R |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-08-18 09:02:37 | Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence |