| From: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "ITAGAKI Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Additional psql requirements |
| Date: | 2008-07-25 08:36:53 |
| Message-ID: | 162867790807250136x794e42a8n997c4bd6dbb062a9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/7/25 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:52 AM, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that a sql-like client side scripting language should be as
>> similar as possible to plpgsql. Pgscript looks a bit like plpgsql, but is
>> pretty much incompatible with it for no particularly obvious reason.
>
> pgScript originally used a c-like syntax when it was pgUnitTest iirc.
> The new version is designed to be familiar to users of T-SQL.
it is little bit unhappy - it's like T-SQL, but it isn't T-SQL - and
it's far to plpgsql
regards
Pavel Stehule
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-07-25 08:40:59 | Re: Additional psql requirements |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-07-25 08:31:09 | Re: Additional psql requirements |