Re: slow query - only uses indices

From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marc <pgsql-general(at)mbreslow(dot)net>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: slow query - only uses indices
Date: 2007-12-24 16:41:11
Message-ID: 162867790712240841y1440623aj6930ee2ea53dd711@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hello

there is some differences:

ndex Scan using i_tablea_atextfield on tablea ru (cost= 0.00..2265.28
rows=2 width=12) (actual time=0.624..881.313 rows=228 loops=1)
Index Cond: (atextfield = 'thelookupval'::text)
Filter: ((achar1field <> 'N'::bpchar)
AND (boolcol3 IS FALSE) AND (NOT (subplan)) AND (subplan))

try tu increase statistic for column atextfield on table ru, ANALYZE
it again and test it.

Pavel

On 24/12/2007, imad <immaad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 7:46 PM, Marc <pgsql-general(at)mbreslow(dot)net> wrote:
> > Hey Folks,
> >
> > This query is running really slowly. Sometimes much slower then others. I
> > have a feeling that there may be contention on one of the indices it is
> > using. In the explain plan, it looks like it estimates 2 rows but actually
> > finds 228 rows? Is that really bad?
> >
>
> You should do an ANALYZE if actual rows are significantly different.
> And they are.
>
> >
> >
> > Query and explain plan are below. Seems like it spend the most time doing
> > Index Scan using i_tablea_atextfield on tablea ru (cost=0.00..2265.28
> > rows=2 width=12) (actual time=0.624..881.313 rows=228 loops=1)
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > SELECT z.atextfield,
> > z.btextfield,
> > z.abigintfield,
> > p.achar255field, p.ptextfield,
> > z.achar1field, u.aboolfield,
> > z.textfield1,
> > z.achar8field,
> > z.achar16field
> > FROM tablea ru
> > INNER JOIN tableb u ON ( u.atextfield = ru.anothertextfield )
> > INNER JOIN tablec z ON u.atextfield = z.atextfield
> > INNER JOIN tabled p ON p.id = z.pid
> > LEFT JOIN tablee m ON u.atextfield = m.atextfield AND m.boolcol5
> > WHERE ru.atextfield = 'thelookupval'
> > AND u.boolcol1 IS TRUE
> > AND u.boolcol2 IS FALSE
> > AND ru.achar1field <> 'N'
> > AND ru.boolcol3 IS FALSE
> > AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 'x' FROM tablea fru WHERE fru.atextfield =
> > ru.anothertextfield AND fru.boolcol3 IS TRUE )
> > AND EXISTS ( SELECT 'x' FROM tablef s WHERE s.atextfield = ru.atextfield
> > AND s.boolcol4 IS TRUE )
> > ORDER by ru.anothertextfield asc
> >
> >
> >
> > Sort (cost=2341.96..2341.97 rows=2 width=146) (actual
> > time=1118.810..1119.098 rows=228 loops=1)
> > Sort Key: ru.anothertextfield
> > -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.00..2341.95 rows=2 width=146) (actual
> > time= 0.930..1117.258 rows=228 loops=1)
> > -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..2313.36 rows=2 width=131) (actual
> > time=0.842..914.554 rows=228 loops=1)
> > -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..2296.65 rows=2 width=93) (actual
> > time= 0.765..901.916 rows=228 loops=1)
> > -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..2281.98 rows=2 width=72)
> > (actual time=0.690..893.648 rows=228 loops=1)
> > -> Index Scan using i_tablea_atextfield on tablea
> > ru (cost= 0.00..2265.28 rows=2 width=12) (actual time=0.624..881.313
> > rows=228 loops=1)
> > Index Cond: (atextfield =
> > 'thelookupval'::text)
> > Filter: ((achar1field <> 'N'::bpchar) AND
> > (boolcol3 IS FALSE) AND (NOT (subplan)) AND (subplan))
> > SubPlan
> > -> Index Scan using tablef_pkey on tablef
> > s (cost=0.00..8.34 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.016..0.016 rows=1
> > loops=228)
> > Index Cond: (atextfield = $1)
> > Filter: (boolcol4 IS TRUE)
> > -> Bitmap Heap Scan on tablea fru
> > (cost=4.61..90.41 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=3.590..3.590 rows=0
> > loops=243)
> > Recheck Cond: (atextfield = $0)
> > Filter: (boolcol3 IS TRUE)
> > -> Bitmap Index Scan on
> > i_tablea_atextfield (cost= 0.00..4.61 rows=22 width=0) (actual
> > time=0.044..0.044 rows=17 loops=243)
> > Index Cond: (atextfield = $0)
> > -> Index Scan using tablec_pkey on tablec z
> > (cost= 0.00..8.34 rows=1 width=60) (actual time=0.047..0.049 rows=1
> > loops=228)
> > Index Cond: (z.atextfield =
> > ru.anothertextfield)
> > -> Index Scan using tabled_pkey on tabled p (cost=
> > 0.00..7.32 rows=1 width=29) (actual time=0.030..0.031 rows=1 loops=228)
> > Index Cond: (p.id = z.pid)
> > -> Index Scan using tableb_pkey on tableb u (cost=
> > 0.00..8.34 rows=1 width=38) (actual time=0.049..0.051 rows=1 loops=228)
> > Index Cond: (u.atextfield = ru.anothertextfield)
> > Filter: ((boolcol1 IS TRUE) AND (boolcol2" IS FALSE))"
> > -> Index Scan using tablee_atextfield_idx on tablee m
> > (cost=0.00..14.28 rows=1 width=39) (actual time=0.883..0.883 rows=0
> > loops=228)
> > Index Cond: (u.atextfield = m.atextfield)
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> I see a lot of Nested Nested Nested Loops on text fields which means a
> lot of string comparisons.
> Try using HashJoin here.
>
> ANALYZE your database and explain again. Or try forcing a hashjoin if you still
> dont see a difference.
>
>
> --Imad
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Innis 2007-12-24 19:25:33 Re: Misnamed field in subquery does not cause error when field name exists in parent query
Previous Message imad 2007-12-24 16:34:25 Re: slow query - only uses indices