Re: change in LOCK behavior

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: change in LOCK behavior
Date: 2012-10-11 01:29:16
Message-ID: 15934.1349918956@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 08:43:34PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we have to revert and go back to the drawing board on this.

> Is reverting going to adversely affect users who are already using the
> 9.2 behavior?

In what way would somebody be relying on the 9.2 behavior?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2012-10-11 01:34:28 Re: change in LOCK behavior
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-10-11 01:16:02 Re: [PATCH 8/8] Introduce wal decoding via catalog timetravel