Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED
Date: 2011-06-13 13:55:35
Message-ID: 15585.1307973335@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> btw, i'm allowed to use ALTER TABLE to assign a new owner (even an
>> unprivileged one) to a system catalog, probably that's a bug.

> +1 for tightening that up in 9.2.

Nonsense. You won't like the results of "DELETE FROM pg_proc;" either,
but we don't try to put training wheels on superusers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-06-13 13:57:50 Re: wrong message on REASSIGN OWNED
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2011-06-13 13:51:26 Re: lazy vxid locks, v1