Re: psql possible TODO

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Harris <lists(at)spuddy(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql possible TODO
Date: 2006-12-05 23:08:57
Message-ID: 15537.1165360137@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> O.k. what about \s# ? Or something like that... Where \s is the good old
> fashioned way, and \s# is my new fandango way?

That's got a meaning already (any argument to \s is the file name to write).

I suppose that if you didn't mind making the command behave
non-orthogonally, you could have "\s" print line numbers while
"\s file" doesn't. Not sure if that's a good idea or not ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-05 23:10:49 Re: psql possible TODO
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2006-12-05 23:07:44 Re: psql possible TODO