Re: Why do OLD and NEW have special internal names?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why do OLD and NEW have special internal names?
Date: 2009-11-20 06:12:38
Message-ID: 15426.1258697558@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> But this brings up another point about the recent discussion of what
> RENAME is good for. Removing RENAME may conflict with using OLD/NEW in
> UPDATE ... RETURNING. No?

Um ... not sure why. Specific example please?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-20 06:19:06 Re: Syntax for partitioning
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2009-11-20 06:12:30 Re: Summary and Plan for Hot Standby