| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Rados??aw Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hugetables question |
| Date: | 2011-06-19 16:26:20 |
| Message-ID: | 15004.1308500780@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:56:15AM +0200, Rados??aw Smogura wrote:
>> I want to implement hugepages for shared memory, to make it transparent I want
> At least in Linux they're trying to make hugepages transparent, so I'm
> wondering if this is going to make a difference for Linux in the long
> term.
It's already done, at least in Red Hat's kernels, and I would assume
everywhere pretty soon. I see no percentage in our getting involved
in that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jesper Krogh | 2011-06-19 16:30:41 | Re: FOR KEY LOCK foreign keys |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2011-06-19 16:13:34 | Re: [WIP] Support for "ANY/ALL(array) op scalar" (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY) |