Re: Synchronized scans

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synchronized scans
Date: 2007-06-08 04:09:20
Message-ID: 14972.1181275760@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Just to be sure: a backwards-started scan is currently unreachable code,
> correct?

[ yawn... ] I think so, but I wouldn't swear to it right at the moment.
In any case it doesn't seem like a path that we need to optimize.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paesold 2007-06-08 07:54:09 Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2007-06-08 03:51:09 Re: Synchronized scans