Re: CTE inlining

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CTE inlining
Date: 2017-05-04 07:25:31
Message-ID: 1493882731645-5959615.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 1) we switch unmarked CTEs as inlineable by default in pg11.

+1 from me for option 1

--
View this message in context: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/CTE-inlining-tp5958992p5959615.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2017-05-04 08:46:07 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-05-04 06:34:16 Re: CTE inlining