Re: Git conversion status

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git conversion status
Date: 2010-09-20 18:25:11
Message-ID: 14538.1285007111@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 20:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> BTW, while poking around in this morning's attempt I noticed
>> .git/description, containing
>>
>> Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

> That said, where was it set to that? A locally initialized repo, or on
> the clone?

That's what I found in the result of
git clone ssh://git(at)gitmaster(dot)postgresql(dot)org/postgresql.git

If git clone isn't meant to copy it, then this is a non-issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2010-09-20 18:26:24 Re: Git conversion status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-20 18:22:55 Re: Git conversion status