Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Date: 2010-04-07 14:46:14
Message-ID: 14518.1270651574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> When there is a specific reject rule, why does the server say
> FATAL: no pg_hba.conf entry

It's intentional. We try to expose the minimum amount of knowledge
about the contents of pg_hba.conf to potential attackers.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2010-04-07 15:41:23 Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Previous Message Olivier Baheux 2010-04-07 12:47:43 system table/view and sequence