Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> I agree that using the FDW-specific options is the right approach and
> disallowing those to be set on foreign tables makes sense. I don't
> particularly like the idea of applying changes during inheiritance
> which we wouldn't allow the user to do directly. While it might be a
> no-op and no FDW might use it, it'd still be confusing.
If we don't allow it directly, why not? Seems rather arbitrary.
regards, tom lane