| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow |
| Date: | 2013-07-26 13:18:07 |
| Message-ID: | 14297.1374844687@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> What about SnapshotSelf?
> Well, that's still used in _bt_check_unique, unique_key_recheck
> (trigger function to do a deferred uniqueness check), RI_FKey_check,
> and rather extensively by sepgsql. I don't really have much desire to
> do the work to get rid of it, though.
Hm. I agree the first three may be all right, but I can't help
suspecting that sepgsql is doing the wrong thing here.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ronan Dunklau | 2013-07-26 13:30:16 | Re: Extensions makefiles - coverage |
| Previous Message | didier | 2013-07-26 13:14:06 | Re: Design proposal: fsync absorb linear slider |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-26 13:50:32 | Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-26 13:05:24 | Re: getting rid of SnapshotNow |