Re: pg_upgrade bugs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade bugs
Date: 2012-09-03 01:39:41
Message-ID: 14239.1346636381@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I have been wrestling for a couple of days trying to get pg_upgrade
> testing working on Windows, with a view to having it tested on the
> buildfarm. The test script has its own issues, which I'll deal with
> separately, but there are two issues in pg_upgrade's exec.c that make me
> suspect that if pg_upgrade has ever worked at all on Windows it is a
> matter of sheer luck. The attached patch fixes these. The first issue is
> a plain miscall to stlcpy(), where the length argument is wrong. The
> second is where exec_prog tries to open a log file after the system call
> returns. This will fail if the command was a 'pg_ctl start', as the
> running postmaster will have the log file open, so I have simply
> #ifdef'd it out for the Windows case, as the code does nothing except
> add a couple of line feeds to the log, missing which won't affect
> anything much.

The strlcpy bug seems to be recently introduced --- I don't see it in
9.2. I think the other bit has not been there very long either,
though it *is* in 9.2 branch so you'd better back-patch that part.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-09-03 02:57:21 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-09-03 01:11:42 pg_upgrade bugs