Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)

From: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)
Date: 2014-12-11 17:04:43
Message-ID: 1418317483965-5830115.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane-2 wrote
> Robert Haas &lt;

> robertmhaas@

> &gt; writes:
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Josh Berkus &lt;

> josh@

> &gt; wrote:
>>> While there were technical
>>> issues, 9.4 dragged a considerable amount because most people were
>>> ignoring it in favor of 9.5 development.
>
>> I think 9.4 dragged almost entirely because of one issue: the
>> compressibility of JSONB.
>
> 2. The amount of pre-release testing we get from people outside the
> hard-core development crowd seems to be continuing to decrease.
> We were fortunate that somebody found the JSONB issue before it was
> too late to do anything about it. Personally, I'm very worried that
> there are other such bugs in 9.4. But I've given up hoping that any
> more testing will happen until we put out something that calls itself
> 9.4.0, which is why I voted to release in the core discussion about it.

The compressibility properties of a new type seem like something that should
be mandated before it is committed - it shouldn't require good fortune that

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/logical-column-ordering-tp5829775p5830115.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G Johnston 2014-12-11 17:11:54 Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-12-11 17:02:16 Re: Commitfest problems