Re: Extensions, patch v20 (bitrot fixes)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, patch v20 (bitrot fixes)
Date: 2010-12-20 20:08:48
Message-ID: 14136.1292875728@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:10:39PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> [citation needed]? Exactly what characters are missing, and why would
>> the Unicode people have chosen to leave them out? It's not like they've
>> not heard of those encodings, I'm sure.

> Here is an interesting description of some of the gotchas:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1252

Well, it's interesting, but I see no glyphs on that page that lack
Unicode assignments.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-12-20 20:08:53 Re: Extensions, patch v20 (bitrot fixes)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-12-20 20:08:02 Re: bug in SignalSomeChildren